5 March 2013
I thought then that only Alice when she was in Wonderland
can drown in her own tears. Les
Miserables proved to me that I am not only capable of producing tears; I
can die of choking from too much of them. I will not attribute all of it to the
film. It must be the signal that triggered the outburst of my repressed
sadness.
There was more reason for me to cry last night when mom was
in anguish. I didn’t. I slept like a baby, I didn’t even pray.
My perspective of the world was brighter today (compared to
days of last week). I was able to fully appreciate the non-sepia hue of the
surroundings, and remind myself of the marvel of the first tree I see each day.
Its branches were cut off recently, it had no leaves but it has recovered and is
again sprouting green bouquets. I found tranquil in the layering of stones; how
they were spread through a stretch of soil. I can sing and sing not from
desperation but sing, heralding the world with cheer. I sense the breeze when
it blows and know that it is a caress of care and hope.
I also found out that I was right. June and Paul were
sheltering me from work. They do not want to overburden me. They are very
considerate. I hope I was reciprocating their consideration. I can only wonder
at that; I would not ask them directly.
June had a cameo in Kapuso
Mo Jessica Soho aired yesterday. Paul recounted to me the scenes. From his
narrative, it came to me that even current affairs programs (supposedly
balanced, realistic and unbiased) romanticize matters much like a tabloid which
presents only those which have a sensational appeal. News suddenly became
scripted drama when originally it had an aseptic air.
Les Miserables did
not adhere de facto to the novel. It
surprised me that my favorite characters in the film were Eponine, Javert,
Gavroche, the Thenadier couple and Enjolras. They were not very remarkable for
me in the novel except Javert whose prominence comes next to Jean Valjean’s. I
also liked Cosette better than Eponine in the novel.
In the film, Amanda Seyfried looks like a Victorian painting
lady who came alive and her voice was crystalline, as if she was suited to sing
arias. Eponine, though a character support for Cosette, was splendid, she
contrasts Cosette not only in countenance but even with their sound! Eponine was
earthy and battered but giving. Cosette was a sheltered bourgeoise though when
they lived together when they were younger it was the other way around.
Eponine’s voice was warm and full; Cosette’s was high pitched and airy. I find
Eponine’s character in the film endearing.
Russel Crowe’s voice was also a revelation to me. I liked
the sound of his voice better than Hugh Jackman’s. It’s not that Jean Valjean’s
voice didn’t sound good, I only prefer Javert’s voice better. Make-up for Jean
Valjean is commendable. In the first part, I almost wasn’t able to identify
24601 as Hugh Jackman. It was inconsistent though that they gave particular
attention to M. Madeleine’s appearance, changing how he looked as he grew older
without applying strikingly observable physical changes on Javert as well.
Eponine made me cry more than Fantine. Samantha Bark’s rendition of On My Own was moving and her death song
was a poignant scene. She has a very tiny waist (Please give room for not being
relevant with adjacent sentences, I have to emphasize this observation).
The film utilized similar sounding tracks with a change in
lyrics or beat as part of its dramatic theme. The cinematography for the first
part was not at par with those in latter parts, it appeared washed out and manufactured.
Maybe it’s because of the copy I received. It must’ve appeared better in the
movie house.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento